ARTICLE

Prevalence of Corotidenary Atheroma in Patients with Coronary Disease: Results of a Monocentric Transverse Study in the Algerian East

A B S T R A C T

Introduction: Patients with ischemic heart disease often have many damages of another vascular territory sometimes without clinical translation, these associations are important to know. Carotid involvement is the most important in terms of morbidity and cardiovascular mortality.
Objective: In our study we have studied the prevalence of carotid atheroma in coronary patients recruited in cardiology in the university hospital centers of the city of Constantine.
Patients and Methods: Our study is descriptive, cross-sectional, monocentric performed in units of cardiovascular exploration of the Regional University Hospital of Constantine. Included subjects had at least one significant coronary lesion ≥50 on a main coronary artery, for each patient, a guided anamnesis and a cardiovascular clinical examination preceded the realization of the supra aortic trunk echodoppler by a vividE9 General Electric ultrasound system started in January 2014, using a linear scanning probe 12L, intended for peripheral vascular exploration, allowing for targeted screening and a precise lesion description. The TSA echodoppler is said to be pathological, if it was at least one atheromatous plaque and / or hemodynamic damage, on one of the carotid axes (common carotid, internal carotid, external carotid), or a carotid intima- media thickness IMT ≥ 1mm. The processing and exploitation of the data made use of SPSS22 software. The processing and exploitation of the data made use of SPSS22 software.
Results: Three hundred coronary patients, middle aged of 61 with predominantly male net, were included. The average IMT of our population was higher among men than women; significant difference (P = 0.042). 51% of our global population had at least one atheromatous lesion on the left common carotid (LCC), dominated by atheromatous plaques (49.7%), hemodynamic lesions were observed in 1.3% of our coronary patients. The same finding was noted for the right common carotid (RCC), affected in 51.4% of our population whose predominant lesions were atheromatous plaques in 50.7%, followed by hemodynamic damages (0.7%).49.3% and 49% of our global population had at least one lesion on the left internal carotid (LIC), and the right internal carotid (RIC). Hemodynamic lesions were more frequent on RIC (5% vs 2%). 47% and 49% of our global population respectively had at least one attack on LEC and REC. Hemodynamic damages were observed in 1.7% on LEC and 1.3% on REC.
Conclusion: Despite the development of vascular functional explorations, there is currently no argument about screening for extracardiac atherosclerotic lesions in populations of selected asymptomatic subjects, according to age criteria or risk factors. In practice, it is when a localization of atherosclerosis becomes symptomatic that the problem of a possible lesional association arises. Coronary artery disease is the most important in terms of morbidity and mortality, and it is often in the context of ischemic heart disease assessment that the modalities for evaluating the extension of atheromatous disease are discussed. These vascular lesions, however, have a significant prognostic importance, like the other comorbidities associated. The search for these lesions therefore seems important to adapt the therapeutic arsenal at the individual level.

KEYWORDS

Coronary artery disease, supra aortic trunk echodoppler, carotid intima-media thickness, carotid stenosis

INTRODUCTION

A true systemic disease, atherosclerosis can affect many arterial vascular territories of different sizes (coronary, carotid, renal arteries, mesenteric arteries, aorta, lower extremity arteries, etc.), causing acute or chronic ischemic events whose main targets are the myocardium, the brain and the lower limbs. In a given individual, the disease favors development on certain arterial axes rather than others. This state of affairs is partly explained by the spectrum of CVRF present in this same individual, some of which are strongly associated with the development of atherosclerosis lesions in specific vascular territories. Coronary Artery Disease is currently the most common and most serious entry point for the atherothrombotic disease, its association with carotid atheromatous damage aggravates even more the prognosis of this category of patients, for this its screening is justified in order to ensure the most complete care of these patients.

Material and methods

Our epidemiological study is observational, descriptive, analytical and mocentric conducted on a sample of 300 consecutive confirmed coronary patients, with at least one lesion ≥ 50% on a main coronary artery, whatever their age and sex; The informed consent and the commitment of the patient for this project are required, respecting the anonymity. The included patients benefited from a collection of the anthropometric measurements (weight, size, and BMI), a collection of information (CVRF, cardio-cerebrovascular diseases), a complete clinical examination, a biological assessment including a complete lipid profile (HDLc, CHOLt, TG, LDLc), a fasting glucose, a creatinine level and calculated Creatinine clearance according to the MDRD formula. A cervical echo-doppler examination (SAT-Echo) was performed by a vividE9 General Electric ultrasound system started in January 2014, using a 12L linear scanning probe, for all patients, centered on the carotid axes. In our work, the SAT echodoppler is said to be pathological it was at least one atheromatous plaque and / or hemodynamic lesion, on one of the carotid axes (common carotid, internal carotid, external carotid), or a carotid intima-media thickness. (IMT) ≥ 1mm. IMT is measured on the posterior wall, of the common carotid, using the zoom, at a distance of one centimeter, from the carotid bulb between the adventitious interface light interface; the calculation is automatic thanks to a software integrated into the Echo device.

The atheromatous plaque is defined by a focal thickening, of the carotid wall measuring more than 50% with respect to the adjacent wall or by a focused region greater than 1.5 mm, with protrusion in the arterial lumen, We chose velocimetric criteria to define carotid stenosis, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), maximal systolic velocities (MSV), internal carotid artery (ICA) and carotid artery (CA) are measured, and in the end, calculating the carotid systolic ratio (MSV IC / MSV CC); a hemodynamic damage is defined by a carotidian ratio≥2 (Table 1). The patient data as well as the results of all the examinations initially recorded on a data sheet established for this purpose, later transferred into a database (EXCEL 2013 file) designed for the same purpose. The statistical analysis is performed using the SPSS 22 software. The results are presented with 95% confidence intervals, as mean, median, standard deviation, and minimum and maximum values, for the quantitative variables as percentages with their standard deviation for the qualitative variables.

Results

Characteristics of the global population: Between June 2015 and March 2016, we previously collected 300 coronary patients (Table 2). The mean age of this population was 61.3 ± 11.3 years with extreme ages ranging from 23 to 85 years, and a median of 62 years, with a significant male predominance (78.3%), this population was relatively thin (mean BMI 27.92 ± 4.66 kg / m2, mean waist size 95.55 ± 11.20 cm). The majority of our coronarians accumulate more than three CVRFs(72.7%). The most prevalent CVRF were age (69%), followed by hypertension (58.7%), physical inactivity (57.3%), dyslipidemia (52.7%), overweight (49%), and diabetes (47.4%). The lowest observed CVRFs were active smoking (32.3%), obesity(29.3%), and a family history of early cardiovascular disease (CVD) early (26.4%). Diabetes is associated with hypertension and dyslipidemia respectively in 36% and 47.3% of cases; the triple association is observed in 37.7%. The personal history of cerebrovascular diseases (ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, TIA), were observed in 2.7%. The majority of our patients (60.7%) were coronary angiography for ACS acute coronary syndrome, the rest for stable ischemic heart disease, mono-truncal involvement, 30.7% bitroncular and 22% truncal tripletism, trunk involvement. left common is observed in 5.6%.

Frequency of Carotid Involvement in Our Coronary Patients

The echo -Doppler SAT was pathological in 185 coronary patients representing 61.7% (Table3). Measurement of IMT involved 146 patients (48.67%), in whom Doppler ultrasound showed no plaques or stenosis, detected atherosclerosis at 31 patients, or nearly 10.34 % of the coronary population and 21.23% of the coronary group with normal SAT echo-Doppler. The distribution of mean IMT by sex, shows a significantly higher rate in men compared to women (Table 4).

A carotid lesion hemodynamic was observed in 12% of cases, the distribution of atherosclerotic lesions shows that (Table 5 & 6):
i. 51% of our global population had at least one atheromatous lesion on the left common carotid (LCC), dominated by atheromatous plaques (49.7%). Hemodynamic damages were observed in 1.3% of our coronary patients.
ii. The same finding was noted for the right common carotid (RCD), affected in 51.4% of our population whose predominant lesions were atheromatous plaques in 50.7%, followed by hemodynamic damages (0.7%).
iii. 49.3% and 49% of our global population had at least one lesion on the left internal carotid (LIC), and the right internal carotid (RIC). Hemodynamic lesions were more frequent on RIC (5% vs 2%).
iv. 47% and 49% of our global population respectively had at least one attack on LEC and REC. Hemodynamic lesions were observed in 1.7% on LEC and 1.3% on REC.

Carotid atheromatous disease is predominantly bilateral, with no significant difference between the two sexes (Table 6), and the frequency of hemodynamic carotid lesions was significantly higher in cases of severe coronary disease (Table 7). Coronary involvement is called severe if there is truncal hemodynamic involvement or damage to the left coronary trunk, isolated or associated with other truncal lesions.

Discussion

Despite the development of vascular functional investigations, there is currently no argument for screening for extracardiac atherosclerotic lesions in populations of selected asymptomatic subjects, depending on age criteria or risk factors. In practice, it is when an atherosclerosis localization becomes symptomatic that the problem of a possible lesional association arises and becomes really serious. Coronary artery disease is the most important in terms of morbidity and mortality, and it is often in the context of ischemic heart disease assessment that the modalities for evaluating the extension of atheromatous disease are discussed. These vascular lesions, however, have a significant prognostic importance, like the other comorbidities associated. The search for these lesions and damages, therefore seems important to adapt the therapeutic arsenal to the individual scale.

In our investigation, a carotid hemodynamic lesion was associated with coronary artery disease in 12% of cases, especially if this coronary artery disease is severe. Our results are close to the majority of such epidemiological series (Table 8): Faggioli et al. Becker and Gabrielle, Salasidis, Fontan et al., Fukuda, Lanzer, Komorovsky, Przewłocki, Imori, Aboyans et al. and Laraba. The therapeutic strategy for multi- local atheromatous disease remains controversial, but it is coronary artery disease that dominates the prognosis.

In case of symptomatic carotid stenosis greater than 70%, the indication of endarterectomy is the subject of a consensus. In case of symptomatic carotid stenosis greater than 70%, the indication of endarterectomy is the subject of a consensus. The treatment of double localization can be proposed at the same time. The problem of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is delicate, and opinions are divided. Decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis and based on age, sex, severity of coronary artery disease, presence on the cerebral CT areas of silent ischemia and the study of echogenicity of atheromatous plaque. to identify these subgroups of patients at very high risk of stroke.

Conclusion

Solid studies show the value of detecting extracardiac atherosclerotic sites in the coronary patient. It is therefore necessary, on the data of the clinical examination but also by the reasoned use of non-invasive imaging methods on the basis of the recommendations, to better plan the patient's assessment. At this price and importance, we can consider appropriate and relevant care, with an acceptable cost/benefit ratio.

Conflicts of Interest

None.

ARTICLE INFO

Download PDF View PDF

Article Info

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

Copyright

© 2023 Rachid Merghit. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Hosting by Science Repository.

DOI: 10.31487/j.CDM.2019.01.02

AUTHOR INFO

Author Info

Ikhlas Gueriane

Abdelhak Lakehal

Mouloud AIT Athmane

Rachid Merghit

Corresponding Author

Rachid Merghit
Cardiology Service, University Hospital Center, Ali Mendjli Constantine, 25000, Algeria

FIGURES & TABLES

REFERENCE

1. Becker F (2016) Artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs. J Maladies Vasculaires 41: 96.


2. Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A, James K, Labropoulos N et al. (1993) Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 80: 1274-1277. [Crossref]


3. Faggioli GL, Curl GR, Ricotta JJ (1990) The role of carotid screening before coronary artery bypass. J Vasc Surg 12: 724-729. [Crossref]


4. Becker F, GF (1991) Chirurgie coronaire et sténoses carotidiennes : données épidémiologiques. Compte rendu du 16e congrès d’angiologie de langue française.


5. Salasidis GC, Latter DA, Steinmetz OK, Blair JF, Graham AM (1995) Carotid artery duplex scanning in preoperative assessment for coronary artery revascularization: the association between peripheral vascular disease, carotid artery stenosis, and stroke. J Vasc Surg 21: 154-160. [Crossref]


6. Fontan C, Casillas JM, Brenot R, Verges B, Cohen M et al. (1999) Bilan d'extension de la maladie athéromateuse au cours de la coronaropathie. Étude rétrospective chez 146 patients coronariens en centre de réadaptation. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 42: 76- 81.

7. Fukuda I, Gomi S, Watanabe K, Seita J (2000) Carotid and aortic screening for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 2034-2039. [Crossref]


8. Lanzer P (2003) Vascular multimorbidity in patients with a documented coronary artery disease. Z Kardiol 92: 650-659. [Crossref]


9. Komorovsky R, Desideri A, Coscarelli S, Cortigiani L, Celegon L (2004) Impact of carotid arterial narrowing on outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 93: 1552-1555. [Crossref]


10. Przewlocki   T,   Kabłak    Ziembicka    A, Kozanecki    A, Rzeźnik  D, Pieniazek P et al. (2009) Polyvascular extracoronary atherosclerotic disease in patients with coronary artery disease. Kardiol Pol 67: 978- 984. [Crossref]


11. Imori Y, Akasaka T, Ochiai T, Oyama K, Tobita K et al. (2014) Co- existence of carotid artery disease, renal artery stenosis, and lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 113: 30-35. [Crossref]


12. Aboyans V, Beregi JP, Delsart P, Lacroix P, Marieet Y et al. (2016) Stratégie de la conduite des examens chez le patient polyvasculaire. EMC-Angéiologie 11: 1-13 .


13. Laraba N, Krim M (2016) Prévalence, facteurs prédictifs et impact de la maladie polyvasculaire chez les patients présentant un syndrome coronaire aigu. Faculté de médecine Alger.


14. Gerhard Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA et al. (2017) 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135 : e726-e779. [Crossref]